INRIStart with a bid your team can actually support
An RFP response is more than polished writing. Buyers ask for capabilities, delivery commitments, references, security answers, and evidence that a supplier can meet the requirements. The INRI GPT proposal workflow helps organize the material you provide into a useful starting point. Give it the relevant question, your approved capability statement, and a past answer that is still accurate. It can outline a response, identify missing facts, and separate a supported claim from a question that needs an owner.
Prepare the source before drafting
Remove confidential information that is not needed for the task. Include the buyer’s wording, any word limit, and the specific facts the reviewer may use. For a longer submission, work section by section rather than pasting an entire bid into one request. A practical example is a supplier describing its support process: supply the service hours and escalation policy, then ask for an answer that preserves those limits. Check any dates, customer references, or certification statements against the original evidence.
Build a repeatable review process
Ask for a requirements checklist before requesting a final narrative. Assign unresolved questions to a person who can verify the answer, and use a consistent structure across repeated bids. In an organization workspace, save instructions as a reusable prompt template and share the resulting conversation with reviewers. This keeps context in one place without implying that the AI has approved the submission. The final response should still follow the buyer’s format and your company’s approval process.
What is included, and what needs a separate project
The individual proposal service is $5 USD paid once, with a service dashboard and private API access for that purchased workflow. The $50 organization package includes the proposal workflow alongside shared team tools. Automatic ingestion of a bid archive, procurement portal access, or a custom document-export pipeline is a separate integration project. The assistant does not establish grant eligibility, invent financial results, or guarantee that a bid will win. Treat its output as a draft and verify every substantive claim.
Evaluate the workflow with your own review checklist
Begin with a sample in the free demo, then compare the draft against its source. Check whether the answer addresses the actual task, preserves important facts, and flags missing information. Decide who will approve the final work and which corrections still require your team. This makes the purchase decision about a practical workflow rather than a promise of automatic results.
Questions before choosing
Can it complete an entire RFP automatically?
It helps draft sections from the text you supply. Long submissions should be split into manageable sections and reviewed before submission.
Does it invent missing evidence?
Missing information should be flagged for review. You are responsible for confirming claims, references, and compliance answers.